Yazar "Getachew, Adom" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    21. Yüzyılda Imparatorluk ve Dekolonizasyon
    (Kapadokya Üniversitesi, 2021) Getachew, Adom
    Sömürgeciligi, bir metropol ve bir koloni arasındaki yabancı yönetimin ikili bir iliskisi olarak temsil eden standart dekolonizasyon anlatısının aksine, sömürgecilik, esit olmayan bir entegrasyon ve ırk hiyerarsisi içerir. Savaslar arası dönemde imparatorlugun dogrudan yabancı yönetimi olmaksızın, kurumsal olarak esnek oldugu öne sürülse de, her zaman hiyerarsi düzenine sahip, uluslararası bir toplum ortaya çıkaran adaletsiz hukuki, siyasi ve ekonomik entegrasyon süreçlerini içermistir; bunların örnegi olarak hepsi önceden bagımsız, hatta Milletler Cemiyeti’nin üyeleri olan, ancak çesitli biçimlerde müdahaleye, gözetime ve düpedüz isgale maruz kalan Etiyopya, Haiti ve Liberya gösterilebilir.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Worldmaking after Empire
    (Cappadocia University, 2021) Getachew, Adom
    Contrary to the standard narrative of decolonization that represent colonialism as a bilateral relationship of alien rule between a metropole and a colony, colonization involves unequal integration and racial hierarchy. Although it was argued that during the interwar period, the empire was institutionally exible without direct foreign rule, it always involved processes of unequal legal, political, and economic integration that produced a hierarchically ordered international society as we have seen, for example, Ethiopia, Haiti, and Liberia, which were all formally independent and even members of the League of Nations, but subject to various forms of intervention, oversight, and outright occupation.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Worldmaking after Empire
    (Cappadocia University, 2021) Getachew, Adom
    Contrary to the standard narrative of decolonization that represent colonialism as a bilateral relationship of alien rule between a metropole and a colony, colonization involves unequal integration and racial hierarchy. Although it was argued that during the interwar period, the empire was institutionally exible without direct foreign rule, it always involved processes of unequal legal, political, and economic integration that produced a hierarchically ordered international society as we have seen, for example, Ethiopia, Haiti, and Liberia, which were all formally independent and even members of the League of Nations, but subject to various forms of intervention, oversight, and outright occupation.