Green Airport building certification comparison: a practical approach for Airport Management

dc.authorid0000-0001-5108-1419
dc.contributor.authorKaçar, Betül
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, Eylem
dc.contributor.authorDalkıran, Alper
dc.contributor.authorKarakoç, T. Hikmet
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-04T07:23:36Z
dc.date.available2022-06-04T07:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentKapadokya Üniversitesi, Uygulamalı Bilimler Yüksekokulu, Havacılık Yönetimi Bölümü
dc.description.abstractIn this study, six certificates have proposed and three of them used by airport terminal building to analyze, measure, and score environmental damage were compared. Certifications handled in the study are LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method), CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment for Building Environmental Efficiency), SBTool (Sustainable Building Tool), ACA (Airport Carbon Accreditation) and Green Airport and Green Company certificates. As a result, this research gathered the most widely used certificates in the literature. In addition, the Green Airport and Green Company certificate, the first green airport certificate in Turkiye, was added to the study for comparison, which has been offered just for airports. Hong Kong International Airport’s sustainability report was examined to determine how many points it would have received if it had applied for the most widely used LEED, BREEAM, and Green Airport and Green Company Certificates regarding the reported activities. The results have shown that the energy and atmosphere category is vital for all certification systems. Also, the study reveals that LEED gets 89.09 over 100 points, BREEAM 93.1 over 100 points, and Green Airport 75 over 100 points which display BREEAM to get a higher environmental response. This study aims to guide green building practices to decision-makers, which has become necessary in many countries. Employees and managers want to know the quality and quantity of sustainable tasks or planning at airports.
dc.identifier.citationKAÇAR, B., Turhan, E., DALKIRAN, A., & KARAKOÇ, T. H. (2022). Green Airport building certification comparison a practical approach for Airport Management. International Journal of Green Energy, 0–0. Doi: 10.1080/15435075.2022.2076236
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15435075.2022.2076236
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2076236
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12695/1618
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000805719300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Sceince
dc.institutionauthorKaçar, Betül
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Group
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Green Energy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGreen building rating systems
dc.subjectAirports
dc.subjectAirport terminals green building certification
dc.subjectsustainability, sustainability applications
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectsustainability applications
dc.titleGreen Airport building certification comparison: a practical approach for Airport Management
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
15435075.2022.pdf
Boyut:
4.36 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale / Article
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: