Evaluation of The Processing Discrepancies Between Dental and Nondental CAD Software Using The Smoothing Design Tool

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUyar, Alper
dc.contributor.authorPişkin, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorPişkin, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorAkın, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorArısan, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorKoçyiğit, Önder
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T06:30:51Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T06:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentKapadokya Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Diş Hekimliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractStatement of the problem: The advancing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology has changed the fabrication protocols of fixed prosthodontic restorations dramatically in the last 25 years. Beside the dental CAD programs open source nondental software have been utilized for prosthodontic purposes. Despite the progress in technology, varying accuracy and precision rates, and lack of standardized workflows are still challenging issues.
dc.description.abstractObjective: No study to the authors' knowledge evaluated the precision of the manually used processing tools of CAD softwares despite the necessity of utilizing multiple tools to design a restoration, thus it was aimed to evaluate the processing discrepancies of smoothing procedures.
dc.description.abstractMaterials & Methods: A virtual working cast of a maxilla with six teeth prepared with shoulder finish lines containing irregularities up to 50?m were composed. The irregularities were smoothed manually using the 'brush' tools in the 'sculpt' mode of the DWOS, Blender and Meshmixer softwares. Smoothed virtual working casts were superimposed with the reference virtual working cast.
dc.description.abstractResults: The results of Tukey HSD test revealed significant differences between Meshmixer and Blender (P=0.000), and Meshmixer and DWOS (P=0.000), no significance was found between DWOS and Blender values (P=0.987).
dc.description.abstractConclusion: The results of the study pointed out that smoothing procedure may lead to significant differences in discrepancy values, nondental CAD software can perform smoothing with less discrepancy thus, commencing further studies including multiple users and softwares for the evaluation of different design tools seems imperative.
dc.identifier.citationUyar, Alper., Pişkin, Bülent., Pişkin, Mehmet Ali., Akın, Hakan., Arısan, Volkan., & Koçyiğit, Önder. “Evaluation of The Processing Discrepancies Between Dental and Nondental CAD Software Using The Smoothing Design Tool”. Acta Stomatologica Cappadocia. 2;1 (June 2022): 18-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54995/ASC.2.1.2
dc.identifier.endpage36en_US
dc.identifier.issn2792-047X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage18en_US
dc.identifier.urittps://doi.org/10.54995/ASC.2.1.2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12695/1639
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.institutionauthorPişkin, Bülent
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKapadokya Üniversitesi Yayınları
dc.relation.ispartofActa Stomatologica Cappadocia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası - Editör Denetimli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectDental CAD Software Program
dc.subjectNondental CAD Software Program
dc.subjectSmoothing Tool
dc.subjectProcessing Discrepancy
dc.subjectBlender
dc.subjectAutodesk Meshmixer
dc.titleEvaluation of The Processing Discrepancies Between Dental and Nondental CAD Software Using The Smoothing Design Tool
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ASC.2.1.2.pdf
Boyut:
1015.51 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale / Article
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Acta Stomatologica Cappadocia - Makale Koleksiyonu